This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
They are well behind, but they aren't losing dealflow to other capital sources. What we are seeing in this challenging fundraising environment is that investors value Walker & Dunlop's access to dealflow and banker/broker distribution network as deals get harder and traditional sources of capital move in and out of the market.
This trend was even more pronounced among funds managing over $50-billion, with Canadian pensions handling 80 per cent of assets in-house versus 34 per cent for their global peers. Alberta Investment Management Corporation (AIMCo) manages around $160-billion, compared with approximately $70-billion at its inception in 2008.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $41,999 !* Dealflow is very strong, and we believe that we are still the best partner in the industry. And the numbers speak for themselves: Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $22,050 !* Thank you for sneaking me in.
And that could be painful, because someone will have to take the pain, even if, unlike 2008, where the risk was concentrated on banks’ balance sheet, today is much more spread across, let’s say, asset managers. And I think this is where the industry should be heading. Are there some conflict of interest involved here?
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,529 !* Over the last 12 months, we have grown managementfees by 26%, fee-related earnings by 27%, and distributable earnings by 22%, all compared to the prior-year period. For many of our products, there is zero redemption.
By significantly expanding our credit platform in 2008 in advance of the extraordinary investment opportunities that arose from the global financial crisis. Notwithstanding the temporary impact from these fee holidays, managementfees increased 5% year over year to a record $1.8 Fee-related earnings were $1.1
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content