This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, youd have $48,005 !* In addition, just this past week, the German Federal Ministry and Minister of Food and Agriculture approved the plan to allow research-focused commercial cannabis pilot programs to test legal and regulated access to cannabis for consumers.
Several factors contributed to the cut, including legalliabilities and the spinoff of its former healthcare unit to create Solventum. Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, youd have $41,848 !* Last May, 3M slashed its quarterly dividend payment from $1.51
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, youd have $46,349 !* This included a $355 million benefit from legal settlements, which are now materially complete. These benefit reductions have been accelerated by the three legal settlements we've implemented over the past four years, covering 70% of our in-force policies.
That was likely due to private markets expansion in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. The information contained in this blog post is not legal, tax, or investment advice. Key Takeaways Looking at the pre-2018 window, there was a trend of overall upward growth in contribution rates across all geographies.
Meanwhile, 3M Company (NYSE: MMM) has gone through legal battles in recent years that are now coming to a resolution. 3M Company 3M Company has dealt with its share of legal issues in the past few years. These legal issues have plagued the company for years, but things are finally coming to a resolution. billion to $12.5
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $42,169 !* Additionally, the company retained $70 million in restricted cash and cash equivalents, primarily related to Escrows under the terms of the MOU related to potential future legacy liabilities. Each claim is different and varying in stages.
More importantly, management also added on the conference call that its "customer agreements contain provisions limiting our liability, and we maintain insurance policies intended to mitigate the potential impact of certain claims and have a strong cash position."
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $44,736 !* Notwithstanding the incredible growth and success of the brand over that time, there is a very substantial growth runway over the coming years as more of the world's 1 billion legal-age smokers switch to better alternatives. points in Q3 and year to date.
Mercedes is accepting legalliability for when it's Level 3 autonomous driving system drive pilot is active. Is Tesla planning to accept legalliability for FSD? Elon Musk Well, there's a lot of people that assume we have legalliability judging by the lawsuits. And if so, when? December 24, Christmas Eve.
It's also possible Englander and his advisors are concerned about an increase in legal expenses for AT&T. In July 2023, an investigative report from the Wall Street Journal suggested AT&T and other legacy telecom companies might incur financial liabilities tied to their use of lead-sheathed cables.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,034 !* NAV is defined as total assets minus total liabilities and is also reported on a per share basis. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $42,133 !* G&A costs declined 3% year over year and remained at 12% of total revenue as legal and professional fees declined by $6 million year over year. Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $420,761 !*
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,369 !* million in share-based compensation, increase in our legal expenses in the amount of $0.5 million, which was offset by a decrease in the cost of our D&O liability insurance premium in the amount of $0.3 The increase of $0.7
And then I moved back to London at the end of 2008, which was a really interesting pivot. At the end of 2008, we owned a lot of illiquid assets. And there was a problem with 168 of them at the end of 2008. It was the year I made partner, actually, in 2008. I did that for a couple of years. RITHOLTZ: Good timing, yes.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, youd have $44,088 !* These factors include, among others, economic or industry conditions, competition, execution risks, the market for advertising, our future financial performance, and legal and regulatory developments. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,529 !* The second point, this brand over-indexes a lot among legal drinking age to 24, 25 consumers. So it's an up-and-coming brand among the young consumers, legal drinking age consumers. And this in itself presents a massive opportunity.
Shortly after The Great Recession began unraveling in 2008, many people feared insurance companies would suffer the same fate as investment banks like Lehman Brothers, Bear Sterns, Wachovia and Washington Mutual. They are legal entities backed by the insurance commissioner in every U.S. Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow Follow.
The period from Q4 2002 to Q3 2008 is exemplary as the longest stretch of continued quarterly growth. The information contained in this blog post is not legal, tax, or investment advice. It was a transition period for the private capital industry, when discussing the size of the alternatives market jumped to trillions from billions.
W e investigated i nfrastructure fundraising in 2021 and have had a nagging curiosity about the lone peak in 2008 fundraising ever since. We see an inflection point in Q2 2008 when the near ly flat curve of total NAV begins to increase at a rate that is sustained throughout the next decade.
Key Takeaways While our data on pre-2010 cash flows is sparser, readers who remember the events of 2008 might recoil at the idea of an invulnerable real estate market. Now in 2024, we see the same curiosity play out as it did in 2008, but for different reasons. This blog post is for informational purposes only.
The trough and peak in North American private credit returns between Q2 2008 and Q3 2009 clearly align with the 2008 recession and accompanying sharp drop in the Federal Funds Rate. The information contained in this blog post is not legal, tax, or investment advice. This blog post is for informational purposes only.
The long period of distribution-heavy years in the 2010s is likely derived from the easy money run of the post-2008 economy. The information contained in this blog post is not legal, tax, or investment advice. That seems to indicate those markets are less macro influenced with investing interest being relatively constant.
As a result, the significance of $2B excess contributions is much greater in 2008 when total contributions and distributions are around $3B. The result is the diminution of the liquidity ratios following the 2008 recession seen in the chart above. The information contained in this blog post is not legal, tax, or investment advice.
Through two separate drawdowns from 1999-2008 , the average buyout fund held above a 1.5x While returns would quickly climb, the y remained suppressed going into the Great Financial Crisis (2007-2008). The information contained in this blog post is not legal, tax, or investment advice. return on its investment.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, youd have $41,138 !* Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability. In addition, any projections as to the company's future performance represent management's estimates as of today, March 13, 2025.
Then , we see positive progression again through the mid – 20 00s until a crash during the f inancial c risis of 2007-2008. The information contained in this blog post is not legal, tax, or investment advice. This blog post is for informational purposes only.
Additionally, this was the lowest third-quarter pace since 2008 to 2010, a stretch of time with sub-3.5% The information contained in this blog post is not legal, tax, or investment advice. This tracks with the downturn across public markets in the same quarter (3Q22); the S&P 500 saw a 6.3% decline from July 1 to September 30.
Only from 2008 onwards do we see significant distributions. The information contained in this blog post is not legal, tax, or investment advice. These trends begin to make sense as we look further back into the 2000’s in the region. This blog post is for informational purposes only.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,529 !* There's still some change of ownership and legal work around those documents. It's not -- there's no material financial restructuring, but Maplewood has a little more wood to chop on the legal side. But just a note there.
The largest exception in the chart is from 2009 – 2011 during the financial crisis, when average commitments dropped rapidly (down nearly 50% from 2008). The information contained in this blog post is not legal, tax, or investment advice. This blog post is for informational purposes only.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $42,465 !* EBITDA was lower due to $32 million in bad debt reserves we booked in SG&A and $20 million of legal reserves. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $42,133 !* The increase in SG&A was primarily associated with increased restructuring costs in the period from settling the leases from company-owned transition studios and increased legal fees to address regulatory inquiries. million through the third quarter.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,618 !* Everything that Mike said, I'd probably focus from the pricing standpoint, just the uncertainty around social inflation, legal system abuse, however, you want to title that, but just uncertainty in general. We don't write monoline business.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,756 !* These deferred tax assets were primarily related to opioid liabilities recognized in prior periods, and they remain available for the company to offset potential future income, including gains from monetizing assets. We recognized a $2.3 billion in total.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,529 !* Rates for legal tobacco products continue to decline and all five of the U.S. It's the MSA benefit from the expiration of the legal fund. Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $406,486 !* Good morning, Matt.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,654 !* In the United States, well in terms of the international legally binding agreement on plastics, I think we're making tremendous progress. Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $404,086 !*
Joining me on today's call are Brian Armstrong, co-founder and CEO; Emilie Choi, president and COO; Alesia Haas, CFO; and Paul Grewal, chief legal officer. Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $44,204 !* First, capital requirements for our regulated legal entities. Ken, this is Paul Grewal.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $41,999 !* And so, we're going to continue to focus on being strong competitors in the legal market. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability. I'll hop back into the queue.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,138 !* Flex supercharges platform adoption making it easier and faster for organizations to displace other technologies through flexibility, turning on and moving between modules without procurement and legal friction. Turning to our outlook.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,034 !* The second and really the primary driver behind this specific quarter increase is really the separation of our Mexican production facility from a legal perspective from Cummins. And so, we've seen a few delays on that front. That was completed in August.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $41,863 !* Does that have any legalliability attached to it? And the numbers speak for themselves: Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $22,254 !* To me, it's probably a net even. There's nothing really happening here.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,756 !* We continue to feel very good about the strength of our balance sheet and the quality of our assets and liabilities, which position us well to serve our clients and execute on our growth strategy. Just a couple of clarification questions.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,618 !* Together with all the key stakeholders, we reached a mutually beneficial solution for all parties, especially for the impacted people, communities, and the environment while creating definitiveness and legal certainty for the companies. Please, Murilo.
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,047 !* We've talked about some legal documents that everyone should have or at least consider, but something we've talked about on the show before, is that you should also include an inventory, everything you own. Robert Brokamp: Wow. Is that generally true?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content