This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Meta aims to significantly boost its 2025 capital expenditure, with CEO Mark Zuckerberg emphasizing the potential for a substantial return on investment (ROI) from AI advancements and even suggesting that capex needs to grow further. It's clear, however, that the company is committed to doing its part to reward its shareholders.
The company generated double-digit-percentage returns on invested capital (ROIC) and solid cash flow per unit even during the financial crisis of 2007 and 2008 and the COVID-19 pandemic period. I'm not worried about the global focus on reducing the use of fossil fuels hurting Enterprise anytime soon.
The good news for shareholders of Enterprise Products Partners is that it's resilient in good times and bad times. Since 2005, the company has never delivered a return on invested capital of less than 10% -- not even during the 2008-2009 financial crisis or the COVID-19 pandemic. Bancorp U.S.
The tech veteran argues that over the next six to nine months, three household names will have earned their membership, profiting shareholders along the way. As leaders in the quest to bring AI to the masses, our trio of companies is well positioned to reap the rewards for shareholders. Image source: Getty Images. trillion and $4.4
On top of this, you also can count on this tech giant returning value to you as a shareholder through stock buybacks and dividends. And after revamping its cost structure a couple of years ago, the company now is seeing return on invested capital and free cash flow taking off. AMZN Free Cash Flow data by YCharts 3.
This benefits shareholders directly because management allocates these excess earnings toward dividend payments. Additionally, Ford must invest heavily in research and development and manufacturing capabilities just to maintain its current competitive position. Good for income investors Ford is a consistently profitable enterprise.
Microsoft earns a high return on invested capital Companies evolve as the world changes around them. A company's return on invested capital (ROIC) shows how efficiently it uses its financial resources to generate income. Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $41,999 !*
The bull market could deliver several more years of great returns, but history shows us the market will have ups and downs. When those down years come, it can be comforting to have a portfolio full of businesses that pay consistent dividends to their shareholders.
Apple's return on invested capital is currently an outstanding 54.1%. On the other hand, Apple has $157 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities on the books, providing ample cushion and giving shareholders peace of mind. Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,533 !*
As a business development company (BDC) , it must return at least 90% of earnings to shareholders as dividends to be exempt from federal income taxes. That's especially cheap for a company that has delivered an average return on invested capital of 12% over the last 10 years. Its forward price-to-earnings ratio of 11.3
And the numbers speak for themselves: Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $23,657 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,034 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $429,567 !* per share.
And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you’d have $359,445 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $45,374 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $484,143 !*
And the numbers speak for themselves: Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $21,217 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $44,153 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $403,994 !* Thanks, Jason. Appreciate it.
It also invests in the funds managed by its alternative asset management affiliate, Brookfield Asset Management. The company typically reinvests 75% of its annual free cash flow to compound value for shareholders. It will return the remaining cash through dividends and share repurchases.
Home Depot's only slight decline in earnings in a challenging environment shows why it is a great long-term investment. It generates a very high return on invested capital of over 30%, and management continues to see a lot of opportunity in a $1 trillion home improvement market. population with same- or next-day delivery.
generates a robust return on invested capital (ROIC) of 23.5%, which means it can generate profits without investing a ton into the business. That efficiency and sustained revenue growth have made the stock a whopper of an investment. The company returns cash to shareholders Pool Corp.'s s financial capital.
Even the great Warren Buffett agrees with this view, as Berkshire Hathaway has been a sizable shareholder for nearly a decade. Return on invested capital (ROIC) is often viewed as the single most important indicator of whether a business has developed an economic moat. Apple's innovation is second to none.
In the past five years, Alphabet's return on invested capital (ROIC) has averaged 23.8%. The business has reached tremendous scale that allows it to leverage its expenses to the benefit of shareholders. And the numbers speak for themselves: Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $21,285 !*
And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, youd have $361,026 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, youd have $46,425 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, youd have $562,659 !* Now let's start the Q&A session.
And from 2008 through 2023, it went on an acquisition spree, buying more than 20 other companies, according to Reuters. Shortly after returning to the market, Michael Dell told CNBC that the company had paid down $14 billion in debt while private. But this was pricey and didn't grow the business as expected. times its trailing sales.
of every revenue dollar winds up as free cash flow , which Visa often sends to shareholders one way or the other. Visa is a bonafide compounder; the stock has obliterated the market, returning 2,000% since going public in 2008. In fact, Mastercard's stock has outperformed Visa's since 2008.
And the numbers speak for themselves: Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $23,295 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $42,465 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $434,367 !* So we remain very open-minded.
The biggest clue will be a return to growth in customer traffic, which was down 1% in the three quarters that ended in late October. But investors holding this Dow stock should still be happy with the company's steady market share gains and its high return on invested capital.
And the numbers speak for themselves: Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $21,294 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $44,736 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $416,371 !* We know how it feels.
And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, youd have $344,352 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, youd have $44,103 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, youd have $543,649 !* dollar during Q4.
And the numbers speak for themselves: Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $22,254 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $41,863 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $368,072 !* But what are you doing with it?
And the numbers speak for themselves: Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $21,049 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,847 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $378,583 !* During the year, we returned $261.8
And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, youd have $350,809 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, youd have $45,792 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, youd have $562,853 !*
And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, youd have $302,501 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, youd have $43,181 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, youd have $527,934 !* We generated $4.6 year over year.
And the numbers speak for themselves: Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $22,050 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $41,999 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $407,440 !* It's too early to tell.
And the numbers speak for themselves: Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $21,294 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $44,736 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $416,371 !* We've returned $2.7
And the numbers speak for themselves: Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $21,365 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $44,619 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $412,148 !* per share in the quarter.
And the numbers speak for themselves: Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $22,050 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $41,999 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $407,440 !* With that, Chris, over to you.
And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, youd have $333,669 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, youd have $44,168 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, youd have $547,748 !* billion of apartments and sold 3.8
And the numbers speak for themselves: Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $23,295 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $42,465 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $434,367 !* Thank you, and good night.
And the numbers speak for themselves: Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $20,633 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $41,238 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $338,114 !*
Glenn Kelman: Well, I was the CEO of Redfin in 2008 when the great financial crisis destroyed the global economy, and the difference this time is that people are not selling homes short or not going through foreclosures. So home prices collapsed in 2008, but not this time. We're in one now that is interesting.
They want to leverage the investments, they being Capital One, leverages the investments and their network they've put down for the last decades, and they can do that by getting larger very quickly with as you say an all-stock deal. In fiscal 2008, which their fiscal year is ending in February, it's always weird. No one noticed.
And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, youd have $320,756 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, youd have $45,331 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, youd have $527,508 !* In 2024, we returned $4.6
And the numbers speak for themselves: Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $21,122 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,756 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $384,515 !* Also humongous.
The company rewards shareholders with an exceptional 8.71% dividend yield, prudently supported by a 59.1% Additionally, its strategic fiber deployment targets high-potential markets with minimal competition, enhancing potential returns on investment. payout ratio. Despite a robust 19.1% times forward earnings.
And the numbers speak for themselves: Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $21,365 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $44,619 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $412,148 !* times on a net debt basis.
And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, youd have $307,661 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, youd have $44,088 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, youd have $536,525 !* Common stock issuances.
A high return on invested capital drives outperformance Another reason to be optimistic about Wingstop's potential is that its return on invested capital (ROIC) has risen from 8% in 2015 to 38% today. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, youd have $376,143 !*
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content